Dimethyl sulfoxide: a central player since the dawn of cryobiology, is efficacy balanced by toxicity?

dc.contributor.authorAwan, Maooz
dc.contributor.authorBuriak, Iryna
dc.contributor.authorFleck, Roland
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Barry
dc.contributor.authorGoltsev, Anatoliy
dc.contributor.authorJulie, Kerby
dc.contributor.authorLowdell, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMericka, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorPetrenko, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorPetrenko, Yuri
dc.contributor.authorRogulska, Olena
dc.contributor.authorStolzing, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorStacey, Glyn N
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T12:44:15Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T12:44:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-28
dc.descriptionAwan M, Buriak I, Fleck R, Fuller B, Goltsev A, Kerby J, Lowdell M, Mericka P, Petrenko A, Petrenko Y, Rogulska O, Stolzing A, Stacey GN. Dimethyl sulfoxide: a central player since the dawn of cryobiology, is efficacy balanced by toxicity? Regen Med. 2020 Mar;15(3):1463-1491. doi: 10.2217/rme-2019-0145. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PMID: 32342730.uk_UA
dc.description.abstractDimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is the cryoprotectant of choice for most animal cell systems since the early history of cryopreservation. It has been used for decades in many thousands of cell transplants. These treatments would not have taken place without suitable sources of DMSO that enabled stable and safe storage of bone marrow and blood cells until needed for transfusion. Nevertheless, its effects on cell biology and apparent toxicity in patients have been an ongoing topic of debate, driving the search for less cytotoxic cryoprotectants. This review seeks to place the toxicity of DMSO in context of its effectiveness. It will also consider means of reducing its toxic effects, the alternatives to its use and their readiness for active use in clinical settings.uk_UA
dc.identifier.citationAwan M, Buriak I, Fleck R, Fuller B, Goltsev A, Kerby J, Lowdell M, Mericka P, Petrenko A, Petrenko Y, Rogulska O, Stolzing A, Stacey GN. Dimethyl sulfoxide: a central player since the dawn of cryobiology, is efficacy balanced by toxicity? Regen Med. 2020 Mar;15(3):1463-1491. doi: 10.2217/rme-2019-0145. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PMID: 32342730.uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn1746-076X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2019-0145
dc.identifier.urihttp://cryo.net.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/778
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherRegen Med. 2020 Mar;15(3):1463-1491.uk_UA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPMID;32342730
dc.subjectcell therapyuk_UA
dc.subjectcell therapy safetyuk_UA
dc.subjectcryobiologyuk_UA
dc.subjectcryopreservationuk_UA
dc.subjectcryoprotectantsuk_UA
dc.subjectcryoprotectant toxicityuk_UA
dc.subjectdimethyl sulfoxideuk_UA
dc.subjectDMSO toxicityuk_UA
dc.titleDimethyl sulfoxide: a central player since the dawn of cryobiology, is efficacy balanced by toxicity?uk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA

Файли

Контейнер файлів

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
Awan_article1_2020.pdf
Розмір:
664,38 KB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Опис:

Ліцензійна угода

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
license.txt
Розмір:
1,69 KB
Формат:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Опис: